Monday 1 February 2016

BHA Weight & Weight-On-Bit

BHA Weight & Weight-On-Bit

One important consideration in designing the BHA is determining the
number of drill collars and heavy-weight pipe required to provide the
desired weight-on-bit. When drilling vertical wells, standard practice is to
avoid putting ordinary drill pipe into compression (recommended by
Lubinski in 1950). This is achieved by making sure that the “buoyed
weight” of the drill collars and heavy-weight pipe exceed the maximum
weight-on-bit. This practice has also been adopted on low inclination,
directionally drilled wells.
In other types of directional wells, it must be remembered that since gravity
acts vertically, only the weight of the “along-hole” component of the BHA
elements will contribute to the weight-on-bit. The problem this creates is
that if high WOB is required when drilling a high inclination borehole, a
long (and expensive) BHA would be needed to prevent putting the drillpipe
into compression. However, for these high inclination wells, it is common
practice to use about the same BHA weight as used on low inclination
wells.
On highly deviated wells, operators have been running drillpipe in
compression for years. Analysis of drillpipe buckling in inclined wells, by
a number of researchers (most notably Dawson and Paslay), has shown that
drillpipe can tolerate significant levels of compression in small diameter,
high inclination boreholes. This is because of the support provided by the
“low-side” of the borehole.
Drillpipe is always run in compression in horizontal wells, without
apparently causing damage to the drillpipe.

No comments:

Post a Comment